- [Resource Hub](/)
- [Publication](/?resource-type=publication#library)
- Reliable detection of subchromosomal deletions and duplications using cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing

# Reliable detection of subchromosomal deletions and duplications using cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing

Vossaert L, Wang Q, Salman R, Zhuo X, Qu C, Henke D, et al.

Prenatal Diagnosis . 2018;38(13):1069-1078. DOI [10.1002/pd.5377](https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5377). PMID 30357877. PMCID PMC6587831.

How to cite

### AMA

Vossaert L, Wang Q, Salman R, Zhuo X, Qu C, Henke D, et al. Reliable detection of subchromosomal deletions and duplications using cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn . 2018;38(13):1069-1078. doi:10.1002/pd.5377

### APA

Vossaert, L., Wang, Q., Salman, R., Zhuo, X., Qu, C., Henke, D., et al. (2018). Reliable detection of subchromosomal deletions and duplications using cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenatal Diagnosis , 38(13), 1069-1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5377

### BibTeX

@article{vossaert2018reliable,
title = {Reliable detection of subchromosomal deletions and duplications using cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing},
author = {Vossaert, Liesbeth and Wang, Qun and Salman, Roseen and Zhuo, Xinming and Qu, Chunjing and Henke, David and others},
journal = {Prenatal Diagnosis},
volume = {38},
number = {13},
pages = {1069-1078},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1002/pd.5377},
pmid = {30357877}
}

Standard prenatal screening reads cell-free DNA from a maternal blood draw, but that DNA is a mix of maternal and fetal fragments. It flags common whole-chromosome problems well, yet small deletions and duplications are harder to see and usually need an invasive follow-up test to confirm.

This group instead isolated whole fetal cells &mdash; trophoblasts &mdash; from about 30 mL of maternal blood, which yields pure fetal DNA. Across 125 samples they recovered on average 4.17 fetal cells each and sequenced them one cell at a time.

The single-cell data detected deletions and duplications from 1.2 to 18.9 Mb, every one matching the amniocentesis or chorionic villus result, and it separated two genotypes in a case of confined placental mosaicism.

[Read publication at Prenatal Diagnosis](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6587831/)

## Key findings

- Fetal cells were recovered from nearly every sample. Across 125 maternal blood samples the method found an average of 4.17 putative fetal trophoblasts per sample (0.18 cells/mL), enough to analyze as single cells.

- Single fetal cells resolved deletions and duplications down to the low-megabase range. Single-cell whole-genome amplification and low-coverage sequencing detected subchromosomal changes from 1.2 to 18.9 Mb, including an 18.9 Mb 4p (Wolf-Hirschhorn) deletion and a 1.2 Mb Xp gain.

- Every finding of 1 Mb or larger matched the invasive diagnostic result. For the four cases with abnormalities of at least 1 Mb, all copy-number calls were concordant with the microarray or karyotype data from amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling.

## CyteFinder in the methods

&ldquo;After the depletion step, all nucleated cells were separated based on density centrifugation, fixed, and stained. All samples were spread on CyteSlides (RareCyte, 800 000 cells/well) and scanned on the CyteFinder instrument (RareCyte), as previously described.&rdquo;

&mdash; Vossaert et al., Prenatal Diagnosis (2018), Methods, &ldquo;Trophoblast enrichment and isolation&rdquo;

Disclosure: RareCyte is listed as an author affiliation on the publication cited above.

Disclosure: RareCyte is named in the competing-interests statement of the publication cited above.

## Why it matters for CyteFinder users

If your work turns on finding a few specific cells in a crowded background, this study shows the CyteFinder doing it in one of the harder settings there is. A fetal trophoblast is a single cell among the roughly 800,000 spread across a slide, and the instrument had to scan every well, read the cytokeratin and CD45 stains, and mark the cells worth picking. The rare-cell problem here is fetal rather than a tumor cell, but the demand on your instrument is the same: locate a scarce, specifically stained cell across a whole slide, then hand off clean coordinates for single-cell retrieval. What followed is the proof the detection held up &mdash; the picked cells yielded enough DNA for whole-genome amplification and sequencing, and calls down to 1.2 Mb agreed with the invasive diagnostic result. For CyteFinder users, the takeaway is that the scan-and-identify step you rely on for circulating tumor cells carries over to any rare cell you can stain, which widens where the instrument pays its way.

[Back to all resources](/#library)
## Related resources
[Article](https://www.selectscience.net/product-news/measuring-versus-reading-transforming-the-field-of-quantitative-pathology?artid=58733) CyteFinder SelectScience
### Measuring versus reading – transforming the field of quantitative pathology
[Read Article](https://www.selectscience.net/product-news/measuring-versus-reading-transforming-the-field-of-quantitative-pathology?artid=58733) [Spec Sheet](https://go.pardot.com/l/455452/2019-11-18/7mzyyz/455452/220141/TS20_103.pdf) CyteFinder
### CyteFinder II HT
[View Spec Sheet](https://go.pardot.com/l/455452/2019-11-18/7mzyyz/455452/220141/TS20_103.pdf) [Spec Sheet](https://go.pardot.com/l/455452/2019-11-18/7mzyz2/455452/220143/TS20_104.pdf) CyteFinder
### CyteFinder II
[View Spec Sheet](https://go.pardot.com/l/455452/2019-11-18/7mzyz2/455452/220143/TS20_104.pdf) [Publication](https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2026.44.16_suppl.5041) CyteFinder Journal of Clinical Oncology 2026
### Clinical validation of circulating tumor cell synaptophysin and androgen receptor expression in metastatic prostate cancer phenotypes.
[View Publication](https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2026.44.16_suppl.5041) [Video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oGC1KRVN2U) CyteFinder 2026
### Dr. Pashtoon Kasi on the impact of circulating tumor cells on clinical research
[Watch Video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oGC1KRVN2U) [Publication](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-03099-z) CyteFinder Nature Biotechnology 2026
### mRNA vaccine immunity is enhanced by hepatocyte detargeting and not dependent on dendritic cell expression
[View Publication](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-03099-z) [Publication](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7618831/) CyteFinder Cancer Immunology Research 2026
### Ex Vivo Immuno-Oncology Platform Reveals Spatial T Cell Infiltration Patterns Linked to ATR Inhibition Responses in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
[View Publication](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7618831/) [Publication](https://doi.org/10.1097/pai.0000000000001311) CyteFinder Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology 2026
### Quantitative Assays for TROP2 Measurement in Breast Cancer and Comparison to H-Score
[View Publication](https://doi.org/10.1097/pai.0000000000001311) [Publication](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12881594/) CyteFinder Nature Communications 2026
### Extracellular matrix mediates circulating tumor cell clustering in triple-negative breast cancer metastasis
[View Publication](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12881594/) [Publication](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.111357) CyteFinder European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2026
### Circulating tumor cells predict relapse in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma
[View Publication](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.111357) [Publication](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12805936/) CyteFinder Cancer Research Communications 2026
### Surface Marker Identification to Capture Live Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
[View Publication](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12805936/) [Publication](https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-0244) CyteFinder Clinical Cancer Research 2025
### Pre-clinical Modeling of Navtemadlin Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in IDH-wildtype Glioblastoma
[View Publication](https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-0244)
